Username:          Password:
Remember Me:    JOIN NOW  |   Forgot Your Password?
Now, more than ever, reject the idea of Hillary for VP
By BardofWilmette - Thursday, June 12th, 2008 at 1:50 AM
  |   Report Abuse  |   RSS Feed
Add to Google Reader or Homepage      Add to netvibes   Subscribe in NewsGator Online
Friend's Email(s)*
(one per row)
Optional Comments
Your Name:

Your Email*:

Apparently, Hillary Clinton has put out the word that she wants to run as Barack Obama's vice-presidential running mate.  Unless the news reports are completely off base, she is now trying to pressure Senator Obama into selecting her for that position.  This presents an interesting test for Senator Obama. 

Remember how several of Obama's presidential rivals, including Clinton and McCain, sharply criticized Obama for saying that he would be willing (or at least would not rule out the possibility) of meeting with some of the world's Bad Guys without pre-conditions?  President Bush (speaking of Bad Guys), speaking at the Israeli parliament, compared the allegedly naïve Senator Obama with Neville Chamberlain appeasing Hitler in 1938-39.  Clinton and McCain more generally accused Obama of giving away the store, as if merely meeting with (for example) the Castro brothers amounts to selling out America's vital interests.  I believe that Senator Obama effectively answered those charges regarding a hypothetical situation. 

Now, however, Senator Clinton has provided a live test for would-be President Obama.  Let's see how he handles it.  She is pressuring him to make her his running mate.  She got 18 million primary votes, many of them from people representing demographic groups that Senator Obama has not yet effectively connected with.  To win the general election, he will need the support of most of the people who had backed Clinton, which effectively means that he will need Clinton's active support.  In order to get that support, will he give into the pressure being applied to put Hillary Clinton on the ticket? 

I have been observing American presidential campaigns for a long time, and I cannot recall any example, nor am I aware of an example for earlier history, where a defeated candidate for a party's nomination actively sought the vice-presidential nomination.  I only know of three cases in recent history (Kennedy-Johnson in 1960, Reagan-Bush in 1980 and Kerry-Edwards in 2004) where the nominee selected his main intra-party rival as a running mate, and in all of those cases, the initiative came from the presidential nominee.

It makes absolutely no sense for Obama to offer that spot to Clinton.  Over the past five months, Clinton has practically written McCain's talking points to use against Obama.  She has made it clear that she believes that Obama is not qualified for the job of President of the United States.  She strongly implied at one point that if he is the Democratic nominee, her supporters should vote for McCain.  I know that she did not explicitly say that, just as President Bush did not explicitly say that Saddam Hussein was behind the 9/1/2001 terrorist attacks, but did everything else possible to leave that impression.  It is one thing to have disagreements over policy, or to campaign on the theme: "Obama would be good, but I would be better."  Instead, Hillary Clinton suggested that Obama was unfit for the presidency. 

If Obama actually selects Clinton for VP, he will be perceived as giving into a mild form of extortion.  In a sense, it would prove his critics to have been correct.  I always thought that Obama making Clinton his running mate was a terrible idea.  The pressure being applied by the Clinton people to do exactly that makes a bad idea even worse. 



Read BardofWilmette’s Last Article: Obama Should Reconsider the Union Bill

 


Discussion:

Obama wouldn’t have come this far if he hadn’t been exceptionally smart, on top of everything else. I believe he will never put Clinton on the ticket for a whole bunch of reasons – dissimilar positions, different frame of mind and so forth. Besides, he knows she would be a liability: the Reps are dying to release all they have on her and Bill – thus taking him down as some kind of collateral damage… Moreover, her name (and Bill's, because that‘s what it is) would prompt the Reps to forget about whatever they dislike about McCain and coalesce just to see the Clintons gone for good. Lots of Independents‘d rather stay at home than vote for the Clintons. And what about those Obama supporters who would do the very same, as they would perceive that Obama’s message of change had been just another empty electoral promise? Furthermore, Obama is aware of how it would look like, if he took on a VP who believes that he = the (would-be) President = the Commander in Chief is inept…

As about her voters: I trust most of them will in fact vote for him, while her extreme base won’t in any case, mainly because Clinton has made sure of it and they simply do as they have been taught (– see all these new factions and websites popping up from all over the place…) I am confident he will do well enough without them, anyway.
 
He will maybe offer her the Dept. of Health – but I wonder if she would accept, because she was in for the whole cake. Would a slice do? (But then again – Clinton‘s economic dilemma might dictate her agenda.)
As you point out, she has not conceded that Obama is the nominee. Not to mention she has maintained her delegates… Doesn’t it sound a wee peculiar? Whatever the news might be reporting, I don’t believe that Clinton is interested in the VP spot – what she’s after is Obama publicly declining her bogus 'offer', which would provide her with further opportunities to persevere in… what she’s been doing so far. And to those who believe it would more or less imply political suicide for her, working against her Party nominee in order to come back in four years, I would like to say: consider Clinton’s record, when it comes to her 'judgment'! After all, it’s all about Obama’s vs. Clinton’s judgment. In my opinion, what we have observed so far tells us that Clinton is not going to become Obama’s VP.
[ Posted at 6:09 PM on 6/12/08 | Reply ]


Recent Posts
By WeNeedObama - Tuesday, January 6th, 2009 at 12:31 PM
[Cross-Posted on my New Blog, Library Grape.] The Obama team made what I consider to be a political masterstroke yesterday by announcing their selection of respected former Congressman Leon Panetta to head the CIA. Although somewhat mixed, the reactions from the intelligence community have included a lot of praise for the Panetta pick: Former inte more...
By jwilkes - Monday, January 5th, 2009 at 7:46 PM
I think it’s incredible that Beau Biden, the Delaware Attorney General and son of the state’s senior US Senator, went overseas for a tour of duty in the Iraq with his Delaware National Guard Unit. It’s a selfless act of bravery and patriotism. And from a partisan standpoint, I think it’s fantastic because far too few Democ more...
By jwilkes - Saturday, January 3rd, 2009 at 5:08 PM
With his ship taking on water quickly, it’s captain- embattled Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich- is still firing his canons wildly. And much to the vexation of Senate Democrats, he’s actually landing some nasty shots. Despite having been charged with attempting use his constitutional appointment powers to sell President-elect Barack more...
More Posts by BardofWilmette
By BardofWilmette - Monday, December 22nd, 2008 at 1:55 PM
I have been an enthusiastic supporter of Barack Obama’s presidential prospects since the beginning, and his actions since the election have generally acted to reinforce my optimism regarding his coming presidency.  Having said this, however, there are a few issues where I believe he is on the wrong side.  One of these is the misnam more...
By BardofWilmette - Friday, November 28th, 2008 at 3:29 AM
Today was Thanksgiving – a very enjoyable holiday – so why would I risk ruining that positive feeling with a suggestion in very bad taste?  I guess that is just the kind of person I am.  The other day, we all saw the scene on television where Alaska Governor Sarah Palin “pardoned” one turkey at a turkey farm near more...
By BardofWilmette - Saturday, November 22nd, 2008 at 3:27 AM
One of the great things about being an American is that anybody can express his or her opinion, no matter how idiotic it may seem to be.  With that in mind, I have a suggestion regarding a prospective bailout of the so-called “Big Three” Detroit-based automobile manufacturers.  First, a disclaimer, even though it may be so obv more...

Alert!Close


Confirm!Close


FeedbackClose




Email Address:

Comments


Image Verification:
(Case Sensitive)

JoinClose


Username:
Password:
Retype Password:
Email:
Image Verification:
(case sensitive):


Forgot Pass?Close


Username:
Email:
Image Verification:
(case sensitive):


Add FriendClose


To:
Subject:
Image Verification:
(case sensitive)

Compose Message Close


To:
Subject:
Image Verification:
(case sensitive)

Message: