Username:          Password:
Remember Me:    JOIN NOW  |   Forgot Your Password?
Senator McCain's pitch for campaign funds
By BardofWilmette - Tuesday, July 1st, 2008 at 1:33 PM
add to digg add to Google Bookmark add to bloglines add to newsgator add to FURL add to Yahoo MyWeb Bookmark newsvine Bookmark del.icio.us Bookmark reddit Bookmark StumbleUpon Bookmark technorati
Friend's Email(s)*
(one per row)
Optional Comments
Your Name:

Your Email*:

I just received a letter, calling itself an "EMERGENCY TELEGRAM", from John McCain.  Actually, it was addressed to my uncle, who died three years ago, and I figured that he would not mind my opening it.  Here are some excerpts:

 Dear Friend,

I have never been one to mince words, so I'll get right to the point.  If you are at all concerned about the prospect of Senator Barack Obama becoming the next President of the United States, then I need your help, and I need it right now.  The November election may seem far off, but the outcome of the election could well be determined in the next 30 days...That is why I am reaching out to you today and asking you to support my presidential campaign by rushing an Emergency Contribution of $2,300, $1,000, $500, $100, $50 or $35 to my headquarters as soon as you possibly can...Senator Obama and his wealthy liberal allies have built the most massive political fundraising machine in modern history.  They are growing their mailing lists and phone banks, perfecting their technologies, developing their money-raising techniques - from telephones to text-messaging to mail to the Internet to knocking on doors.  And it is working...

After explaining the fact that he needs a bunch of money for his campaign, Senator McCain's message then turns to explaining why Obama should be stopped, and the supposedly dire consequences of an Obama victory:

  • The respected National Journal news periodical recently identified Senator Obama as the single most liberal member of the entire U.S. Senate - as his record and rhetoric makes perfectly obvious.
  • Senator Obama wants to raise your taxes.
  • Senator Obama wants to increase the size of the federal government.
  • Senator Obama offers a big government solution to health care coverage.
  • And of course, Senator Obama will surrender to Al Qaeda in Iraq and withdraw our armed forces based on an arbitrary timetable.
My friend, I will never surrender to our enemies...

In short, the difference between me and Senator Obama is unmistakable.  If my opponent wins the White House in November, we could be facing one of the most radical and extreme shifts in the direction of our nation in American history.  And if Democrats also retain control of Congress, they would control the entire federal government and that would be unstoppable. 

Then, the message goes back to the money issue, that McCain needs the funds to counter the "vicious attacks" on him by the "unregulated 527 soft-money groups like the notorious MoveOn.org." 

Well, let me save Senator McCain the postage that would be due in his Business Replay Mail envelope, and respond publicly:

Senator McCain, my uncle is dead, and to the best of my knowledge, none of the immediate family still alive supports your candidacy for president.  A few extended family members probably do, but you will have to find them on your own. 

In addition, your assertions about Senator Obama are the same kind of distortions that you accuse Obama's allies of doing to you.  The "most liberal member of the Senate" tag is bullshit, and you know it.  It is kind of like calling Tolstoy's War and Peace the greatest novel ever written.  A plausible case might be made, but stating an opinion as an objective fact is intellectually dishonest.  As for Obama's alleged intention to raise taxes and increase the size of the federal government, that is also misleading at best.  He would raise some taxes and reduce others.  President George W. Bush has presided over a huge increase in the federal government during his regime, and largely with your support, Senator McCain.  Besides that, the real burden on American taxpayers is government spending, not its current year tax collections.  Increasing government spending while reducing tax collections is actually a tax increase.  It just shifts the tax burden to our children.  It is a disgrace.  True small-government conservatives should be appalled at the record of Mr. Bush.  While you took some admirably independent stands in past years, you have been as loyal as a lapdog to Mr. Bush lately. 

Finally, your assertion that "Senator Obama will surrender to Al Qaeda in Iraq" is downright offensive, as far as I am concerned.  I am well aware that distorting a political opponent's statements and voting record is as American as apple pie, and I do not expect either you or Senator Obama to completely refrain from it.  However, your statement practically accuses Senator Obama of treason.  The war in Iraq, which you have supported every step of the way, is by far the biggest foreign policy mistake in U.S. history.  I will not elaborate on the reasons here.  There are many fine books which provide the details and documentation, as you are well aware.  Let me just note here that the war in Iraq removed focus and resources from Afghanistan, whose Taliban rulers had provided a base for Al Qaeda.  In effect, it is President Bush - with the encouragement and assistance of Senator McCain, among others - who in effect weakened the effort against Al Qaeda.  I would never accuse you, or even President Bush, of treason, but the effects of his policies (with your support) are far more harmful to our country's interests than anything Barack Obama has ever dreamed of.  

I am the Bard of Wilmette, and I approved this message.



Read BardofWilmette’s Last Article: McCain and Palin are bad for America

Like the article? Share it with your friends!

add to digg add to Google Bookmark add to bloglines add to newsgator add to FURL add to Yahoo MyWeb Bookmark newsvine Bookmark del.icio.us Bookmark reddit Bookmark StumbleUpon Bookmark technorati

Discussion:


Recent Blogs
By jwilkes - Monday, October 13th, 2008 at 12:37 AM
As the margin widens between Democratic frontrunner Barack Obama and his Republican opponent, Arizona Senator John McCain, Obama looks to be closing in on an electoral achievement that has eluded every Democratic presidential candidate for the last 30 years: a national majority. Despite landslide victories in both 1992 and 1996, Bill Clinton was more...
By chriszuk - Sunday, October 12th, 2008 at 3:17 PM
We’ve all met them - those Fox News junkies who think that the liberal media elite is out to help put “terrorists” in office and run our great country into the ground. They thank God for crusaders like Bill O’Reilly and others with the same distorted worldview, claiming that every other source of information is just another more...
By jwilkes - Sunday, October 12th, 2008 at 5:16 AM
Democrats have had their fair share of disastrous defeats in Senate elections. In 1994’s “Republican Revolution,” the GOP swiped eight seats from underneath incumbent Democrats to take hold of the majority. In 1980, Republicans rode Ronald Reagan’s coattails to post a 12-seat gain after a long stretch of Democratic rule. B more...
More Blogs by BardofWilmette
By BardofWilmette - Tuesday, October 7th, 2008 at 2:57 AM
Greetings from The Great White North.  Yours truly is away for awhile, with almost no access to American television or radio, so I will be less in touch with the U.S. political campaign for the next two weeks.  However, I did pick up a copy of a Montreal newspaper today (by the way, Obama is very popular in Canada), and read th more...
By BardofWilmette - Sunday, September 28th, 2008 at 7:21 PM
The polls following the first Obama-McCain debate suggest that Obama at least held his own against McCain in the debate, whose topic was arguably in McCain’s home ballpark.  I am glad to see that, because frankly, I was disappointed in Obama’s performance. This is not to say that McCain supporters have much cause to be proud of the more...
By BardofWilmette - Friday, September 26th, 2008 at 8:07 PM
When John McCain startled nearly everybody by selecting Alaska Governor Sarah Palin to be his vice-presidential running mate, my first reaction was that this was a poor choice, because she would fire up the Republican Party base but turn off too many others to be of much help to McCain.  I figured that she would help solidify McCain’s po more...

Alert!Close


Confirm!Close


FeedbackClose




Email Address:

Comments


Image Verification:
(Case Sensitive)

JoinClose


Username:
Password:
Retype Password:
Email:
Image Verification:
(case sensitive):


Forgot Pass?Close


Username:
Email:
Image Verification:
(case sensitive):


Add FriendClose


To:
Subject:
Image Verification:
(case sensitive)

Compose Message Close


To:
Subject:
Image Verification:
(case sensitive)

Message: