Username:
Password:
How are we doing on the "war on terror"?
The 7th anniversary of 9/11 is right
around the corner. Nobody can contest that the tragedy was the
defining moment of the Bush administration, it was at the very core
of most decisions made from the wars in Afghanistan & Iraq to the
Patriot Act and the massive spying on American people.
One would argue that it made the Bush administration into a horse with blinders, narrowly focused on only one goal: Make sure an event like 9/11 would never happened again.
The fact that we did not have a terrorist attack will become the key argument for McCain in November. You can count on his campaign, the GOP, FOX news and all the usual suspects in the art of spinning fiction into reality to make it the corner stone of his presidential bid. They will build up on fear and paranoia to convince American people that only " McCain can keep America safe".
However, what Americans should keep in mind, before they cast their ballots in November, is the dramatic increase of terrorism world wide. Today a bomb exploded in Istanbul, yesterday it was a few in India.....people barely pay attention to it unless it is very deadly or completely original in its technical execution. It has sadly become a way of life in most countries on the planet. Some governments in Europe are considering terrorism as more of a policing issue as opposed to a problem that can be handled by military force alone.
It is also very hard to fight a "war" against an enemy that is not clearly identified. In our case of the so called "war on terror", we are dealing with threats that are polymorphic and shift constantly from one part of the globe to another. The Bush administration has being claiming for years that "Iraq is the center of the war on terror"; of course it wasn't the case before the US invasion but did become one for a while. It appears that, right now, the real " hot spot " is again Afghanistan and could become sooner than later Pakistan.
The critical question here is this: Assuming that the "war on terror" can have an end-game , are we winning it? The goal of the attack of 9/11 by Osama Bin Laden and his Al Qaeda organization was to set up the 1st phase in an elaborate psychological warfare. It seems likely that Bin Laden knew a swift retaliation would come from the US and NATO in the form of an invasion of Afghanistan. Bin Laden couldn't predict the invasion of Iraq, but it became quickly an opportunity for him to get America trapped in a very costly quagmire.
The real objective of Bin Laden and his associates was an attack on America' s economy....this is probably why he picked the World Trade Center towers to be the first targets, for the symbolic aspect of it. The current crisis of the US and Europe's economy can be linked to two wars with a price tag of $1 trillion. We have our "war on terror", the global terror originated by Al Qaeda is a war on the world's economy and prosperity. At this juncture, it is hard to tell who is winning.
Cross-Posted at MercyPolitics --
Read MercyPolitics’s Last Article: For McCain, Maverick = Erratic
One would argue that it made the Bush administration into a horse with blinders, narrowly focused on only one goal: Make sure an event like 9/11 would never happened again.
The fact that we did not have a terrorist attack will become the key argument for McCain in November. You can count on his campaign, the GOP, FOX news and all the usual suspects in the art of spinning fiction into reality to make it the corner stone of his presidential bid. They will build up on fear and paranoia to convince American people that only " McCain can keep America safe".
However, what Americans should keep in mind, before they cast their ballots in November, is the dramatic increase of terrorism world wide. Today a bomb exploded in Istanbul, yesterday it was a few in India.....people barely pay attention to it unless it is very deadly or completely original in its technical execution. It has sadly become a way of life in most countries on the planet. Some governments in Europe are considering terrorism as more of a policing issue as opposed to a problem that can be handled by military force alone.
It is also very hard to fight a "war" against an enemy that is not clearly identified. In our case of the so called "war on terror", we are dealing with threats that are polymorphic and shift constantly from one part of the globe to another. The Bush administration has being claiming for years that "Iraq is the center of the war on terror"; of course it wasn't the case before the US invasion but did become one for a while. It appears that, right now, the real " hot spot " is again Afghanistan and could become sooner than later Pakistan.
The critical question here is this: Assuming that the "war on terror" can have an end-game , are we winning it? The goal of the attack of 9/11 by Osama Bin Laden and his Al Qaeda organization was to set up the 1st phase in an elaborate psychological warfare. It seems likely that Bin Laden knew a swift retaliation would come from the US and NATO in the form of an invasion of Afghanistan. Bin Laden couldn't predict the invasion of Iraq, but it became quickly an opportunity for him to get America trapped in a very costly quagmire.
The real objective of Bin Laden and his associates was an attack on America' s economy....this is probably why he picked the World Trade Center towers to be the first targets, for the symbolic aspect of it. The current crisis of the US and Europe's economy can be linked to two wars with a price tag of $1 trillion. We have our "war on terror", the global terror originated by Al Qaeda is a war on the world's economy and prosperity. At this juncture, it is hard to tell who is winning.
Cross-Posted at MercyPolitics --
Read MercyPolitics’s Last Article: For McCain, Maverick = Erratic
Recent Blogs
By jwilkes - Thursday, November 20th, 2008 at 10:12 PM
Now that Missouri - the last outstanding state in the presidential race - had been counted and declared for Republican John McCain, we can officially evaluate how the major predictors did in their predictions for the 2008 elections. A comparative chart is below.
On November 4, I set my
official prediction for the 2008 election. How’d we more...
By purpleonyx - Thursday, November 20th, 2008 at 9:48 AM
P.E.W.S. – Post Election Withdrawal Syndrome
urbandictionary.com
After Obama got elected I became depressed. Not for the usual reasons political junkies get depressed post election. It was a question asked of Tavis Smiley that night that got to me. He was asked if he thought this meant “the issue of race had be more...
By jwilkes - Thursday, November 20th, 2008 at 12:26 AM
With every selection that Barack Obama makes for his White House team, right-wing pundits scramble for their megaphone to lambaste the President-elect for choosing former Clinton Administration officials and Capitol Hill veterans. And every time, it sounds something like this: “filling the Cabinet with former Clinton operatives, former Cong more...
More Blogs by MercyPolitics
By MercyPolitics - Monday, October 6th, 2008 at 8:17 PM
America is in a deep crisis, and what you would expect from someone aspiring to be the Commander in Chief is to have foresight, remain steady under pressure and have an uncommon ability for leadership. In the last few days McCain didn't display any of those qualities.
His first decision to be a no show at the debate with Obama last week was a grav more...
By MercyPolitics - Thursday, September 25th, 2008 at 5:17 PM
Two terms of the Bush administration have left America at the brink of bankruptcy. From Wall Street to Main Street, the level of anxiety is palpable and seems to be almost comparable to the immediate aftermath of 9/11.
As ordinary Americans watches their life saving and prospect of security and sound retirement quickly vanish, the Bush administrat more...
By MercyPolitics - Tuesday, July 22nd, 2008 at 11:50 AM
After almost 8 years of incredible
mismanagement by the Bush Administration, America is in a state of
complete shambles. Last year, I took photographs of graffiti sprayed on
a crumbling house in the lower 9th ward in New Orleans; it said
"America needs help". This is probably, in a nutshell, the most
accurate political statement of today.The number more...
