Don’t believe me? Well I come armed with data to support my claim, so keep an open mind.
My entire premise is based on very high turnout rates among black voters. The
To get started, let’s look at the demographics of the
|
State Demographics |
Black |
White |
|
Georgia (GA) |
30% |
70% |
|
|
30% |
70% |
|
|
33% |
67% |
|
|
37% |
63% |
|
|
27% |
73% |
Now let’s apply our voter turnout model to these numbers to see what the demographics of the voting population looks like.
|
Voting Demographics |
Black |
White |
% of whites (absolute) |
|
GA |
37.24% |
62.76% |
12.76% |
|
SC |
37.37% |
63.12% |
12.63% |
|
LA |
41.71% |
58.94% |
8.29% |
|
MS |
45.65% |
55.15% |
4.35% |
|
|
33.87% |
66.13% |
16.13% |
The third column is the percentage of white voters that Obama needs to get in order to win. Let’s compare these numbers to John Kerry’s totals among white voters in 2004:
|
White Vote by State |
Bush |
Kerry |
Kerry white vote % |
|
GA |
1,885,540 |
976,797 |
34% |
|
SC |
924,054 |
475,126 |
34% |
|
LA |
1,083,724 |
559,473 |
34% |
|
MS |
660,216 |
296,861 |
31% |
|
|
1,160,513 |
515,939 |
31% |
So right off the bat, it’s clear that Obama needs far fewer white votes than Kerry. Given some of the racial factors at play, that’s a good thing for Obama. But how realistic is it for Obama to actually get the white vote percentages that he needs? Luckily, the Democratic primaries were very competitive this year, so we have some good data on white support for Obama in the
|
|
Kerry 2004 |
% of |
State |
% White |
% of |
|
GA |
34% |
37% |
43% |
15% |
-10% |
|
SC |
34% |
39% |
25% |
8% |
18% |
|
LA |
34% |
26% |
30% |
10% |
-5% |
|
MS |
31% |
17% |
25% |
8% |
-11% |
|
|
31% |
52% |
28% |
9% |
34% |
The columns here are a bit wordy, so let me explain my assumptions and calculations. The first column is a repeat of the final column from the previous table. The second column simply calculates the % of white voters that supported Kerry that Obama needs to win over. The third column is Obama’s white vote percentages in the Democratic primary.
The fourth column is really important. I assumed that the pool of white Democratic primary voters roughly maps to the white voters that supported Kerry in ’04. Using that assumption, we can predict that Obama starts off with 15% of the white vote in
The final column represents this percentage as a percentage of the white votes cast for other candidates (Clinton and Edwards) in this year’s primary. As you can see, Obama already has all the support he needs to win MS, LA and GA. In South Carolina, Obama needs about 4.14% to win. That works out to 16% of Clinton’s white voters. In case it’s not clear, the reason for doing this is because it is unlikely that white support for Obama will come from the pool of white voters that supported George W. Bush.
There are basically two assumptions that this model is based on that can be challenged. First and most obvious are the turnout assumptions. The second is the assumption that the voters in the Democratic primaries map proportionatel to Kerry voters. ( I guess one other assumption built into the model worth mentioning is that the state level demographics cited in the beginning are identical to the demographics of the voting age population of each state. That could swing the numbers in either direction by a couple of points.)
In case you’re wondering, even if you’re conservative and assume a 75% turnout among blacks, Obama still needs less than 50% of
Even though (with the exception of Georgia) no polling outfit is giving Obama much of a chance in the South (nor for that matter is Obama actively campaigning there), I’m willing to go out on a limb and say that Obama will almost certainly win Mississippi, Louisiana * and Georgia, where the Bob Barr effect will also be at play. Obama has a good shot in
Another important point is that this demographic tidal wave will probably take down Sen. Chambliss in
So to all you Obama supporters in the heart of the old Confederacy, your vote really matters. If you or someone you know thought you couldn’t paint your state blue this Tuesday, show them this article for motivation.
* The demographic breakdown is from 2005, before Hurricane Katrina. Any changes in the size of the black population as a percentage of the total population of









