Username:          Password:
Remember Me:    JOIN NOW  |   Forgot Your Password?
GOP's "Team Clinton" Attack On Obama is Ridiculous
By jwilkes - Thursday, November 20th, 2008 at 12:26 AM
  |   Report Abuse  |   RSS Feed
Add to Google Reader or Homepage      Add to netvibes   Subscribe in NewsGator Online
Friend's Email(s)*
(one per row)
Optional Comments
Your Name:

Your Email*:

With every selection that Barack Obama makes for his White House team, right-wing pundits scramble for their megaphone to lambaste the President-elect for choosing former Clinton Administration officials and Capitol Hill veterans. And every time, it sounds something like this: “filling the Cabinet with former Clinton operatives, former Congressmen, and former Senators doesn’t uphold the commitment to ‘change’ he talked about during the campaign.”

Before we torpedo this idiotic critique, let’s acknowledge that this is a perfect example of a Catch-22 partisan attack. If Obama taps individuals who’ve spent their careers developing the necessary qualifications for the incredibly important jobs they’ll hold in the Administration, they’re “Washington insiders,” living and breathing examples of “politics as usual.” If he chooses business leaders and lawyers and others who’ve never set foot in D.C., he’s being irresponsible by leaning on advisors who have no experience whatsoever. If he surrounds himself with the same people who ran his campaign, he’s allowing himself to be the pawn of partisan politics. The line is thin, and no matter where Obama steps, he’s likely to have stepped over it one way or another, depending on who you ask.

Politico.com emblazoned headlines about Obama getting the “Clinton Team Back Together.” It’s true that those who’ve already been selected have ties to the 42nd President. Rahm Emanuel (Obama’s Chief of Staff) served as a senior communications director in the Clinton White House. Eric Holder (the rumored Attorney General-to-be) became the first Deputy Attorney General during the Clinton years. Obama is even considering putting former First Lady in the top spot at the State Department.

But the truth is, where else would Obama go to find qualified candidates for the job? Bill Clinton is the only Democrat to have served in the White House in nearly 30 years. The vast majority of those who have earned the privilege to be considered for a high-profile job in the Administration had to have made their marks during the Clinton years. Clinton chose them because at the time, they were the very best at what they did. It’s conceivable that eight years later, some of them are still going to be at the top of the list.

It’s not as if the Republican attack dogs don’t know this. These are the same talking heads that slammed Obama as not having experience, and then turned around and claimed that his vice presidential selection of a 30-year Senate veteran in Joe Biden as being too much of a career politician (this, contrasted against a GOP presidential candidate who’d spent 25 years in the Senate and a vice presidential candidate who’d spent less than two years in big league politics).

Contrary to a lot of the criticism, however, Obama has surrounded with some who’ve spent their careers far from the beltway.  It was announced in the last 24 hours that Penny Pritzker, a Chicago businesswoman, would head up the Commerce Department, pending further vetting by Obama's transition team. Google CEO Eric Schmidt, Berkshire Hathaway Chairman Warren Buffet, Xerox Corp. CEO Ann Mulcahy, and Time Warner Chairman Richard Parsons are just a few of the non-politicos Obama put on his economic advisory team. Dow Chemical CEO Andrew Leveris and Google Climate Director Dan Reicher are both major candidates for Energy Secretary and climate czar, and T. Boone Pickens (however unlikely) is still in the mix as well. There will be career soldiers, like retired General James Jones, who end up in top national security positions. After winning his Nobel Prize for Economics, New York Times columnist Paul Krugman (who blasted Obama during the primary)- is frequently mentioned as a possibility for Treasury Secretary. There will probably be a few New England academics as well.  And it's also expected that Arizona Governor Janet Napolitano, a woman who has never held federal office, will become the first female Secretary of Homeland Security.

In any event, the “Washington insiders” argument is unpersuasive, and worse, even the most ardent Obama-hater has to admit that Obama has selected incredibly qualified advisors so far. Emanuel is- if nothing else- an enforcer, which is exactly what you want in a White House Chief of Staff. Eric Holder is a top notch attorney with high level government law experience. And if he selects Hillary Clinton for Secretary of State, few can say that the Senator was anything less than a goodwill ambassador while she was First Lady (and let’s not forget, a little less than half of the Democratic Party thought she was qualified to be in Obama’s position). Because more than the “experienced vs. inexperienced,” “Washington insider vs. Washington outsider” conundrum that the right-wing has trumpeted, this process is about putting together the smartest, most effective team possible. And so far, Obama has done just that.



Read jwilkes’s Last Article: Joe Being Joe: Biden's Flaw His Greatest Strength

 


Discussion:
[-] Clinton team recycled - Guest-The Bard of Wilmette
I agree that the criticism directed at Obama for choosing several former Clinton administration officials is unjustified, for the reasons that jwilkes has articulated.

However, in one respect the critics are correct. Obama's message control prior to the election was extraordinary. Since the election, there have been all kinds of leaks to the press, and this has had the effect of making Obama look foolish. I can only guess that one or more among the people recently acquired by the Obama team have been careless, or worse, with these leaks. If they can be identified, they should be fired, regardless of the perceived value they would otherwise have for Obama. They are pursuing their own agendas and ill serving the president-elect.

To me, Hillary Clinton is probably not a good choice for Secretary of State. She has shown no evidence of being a good administrator, and I am not confident that she would willingly advance Obama's policy goals if she disagreed with them. If she does end up getting the job, I hope she will prove me wrong. In any case, this dragged out process has been awkward. If Obama wanted to offer Clinton the job, he should have done so quietly, spelled out the conditions and expectations, told her to think about it for a few days, and inform him of her decision... all of this before any word got out to the media.
[ Posted at 9:23 AM on 11/20/08 | Reply ]
and love partisan division. It's the only thing the Rs are really good at - dividing the country. They should just suck it up and get with the rebuild program. That would really mean putting the country first.

The last time we had a healthy economy was during the Clinton administration. Of course Obama is going to reach for experts who knew what they were doing. The Rs just hate it that Obama has talent this close to that he can bring in. We've been through 8 years of Republican leadership that drove this economy into the ground, it's time for the real leaders to get us going again.
[ Posted at 1:40 PM on 11/20/08 | Reply ]
why they think there is some parallel universe where there exists a pool of experienced Dems who didn't work for the Clinton Administration. Was there some *other* Dem POTUS in the last 20 years that we all missed? You want he should hire only those who were Dem and anti-Clinton? Brilliant!

The right is entitled to their point of view, but until they learn to engage their rationality they continue to betray their own cause. And we will continue to laugh in their face, what else can we do? It would be so much better if they would grow up already.
[ Posted at 1:41 PM on 11/20/08 | Reply ]
[-] The Republicans do sound sore - Guest-MediaWeasel
and they are being partisan. So there isn't someone suitable on the Republican side who would fit the bill? Well what a surprise - especially since the Republicans were just voted out of office and don;t have the greatest reputation for sound and honest dealing.

Spacester makes a perfectly valid point about the mythical pool of "non Clinton" Democrats. I'm surprised the Reps don't understand that.
[ Posted at 1:42 PM on 11/20/08 | Reply ]
if President Obama's Team is Dem. or Rep. I just want people with "INTELLIGENCE, HONESTY AND A GREAT WORK ETHIC".

And the APH (American Party of Hate) just appeals to a minority of people in our country. They can spew all the BS they want. Anyone that listens to them...is just slowing down the progress of recovery in America and hurting the country they claim to love so much.
[ Posted at 1:43 PM on 11/20/08 | Reply ]
[-] I agree - Guest-Eyebee
with your comments 100%. Well said.E
[ Posted at 1:44 PM on 11/20/08 | Reply ]
[-] Experienced people - Guest-RedColumbine
who aren't in big oil/big war's pocket WOULD be easiest to find among the ranks of the most recent independent administration, wouldn't they?
[ Posted at 1:45 PM on 11/20/08 | Reply ]


Recent Posts
By jwilkes - Wednesday, January 7th, 2009 at 1:14 PM
It doesn't take a veteran of the political scene to know that Joe Biden has a long, storied history of leaving interviews, press conferences, campaign events, and virtually any meeting that involves members of the press or general public with the distinctive taste of leather and rubber in his mouth. To be frank: he's frank. He'll say what's on hi more...
By WeNeedObama - Tuesday, January 6th, 2009 at 12:31 PM
[Cross-Posted on my New Blog, Library Grape.] The Obama team made what I consider to be a political masterstroke yesterday by announcing their selection of respected former Congressman Leon Panetta to head the CIA. Although somewhat mixed, the reactions from the intelligence community have included a lot of praise for the Panetta pick: Former inte more...
By jwilkes - Monday, January 5th, 2009 at 7:46 PM
I think it’s incredible that Beau Biden, the Delaware Attorney General and son of the state’s senior US Senator, went overseas for a tour of duty in the Iraq with his Delaware National Guard Unit. It’s a selfless act of bravery and patriotism. And from a partisan standpoint, I think it’s fantastic because far too few Democ more...
More Posts by jwilkes
By jwilkes - Wednesday, January 7th, 2009 at 1:14 PM
It doesn't take a veteran of the political scene to know that Joe Biden has a long, storied history of leaving interviews, press conferences, campaign events, and virtually any meeting that involves members of the press or general public with the distinctive taste of leather and rubber in his mouth. To be frank: he's frank. He'll say what's on hi more...
By jwilkes - Monday, January 5th, 2009 at 7:46 PM
I think it’s incredible that Beau Biden, the Delaware Attorney General and son of the state’s senior US Senator, went overseas for a tour of duty in the Iraq with his Delaware National Guard Unit. It’s a selfless act of bravery and patriotism. And from a partisan standpoint, I think it’s fantastic because far too few Democ more...
By jwilkes - Saturday, January 3rd, 2009 at 5:08 PM
With his ship taking on water quickly, it’s captain- embattled Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich- is still firing his canons wildly. And much to the vexation of Senate Democrats, he’s actually landing some nasty shots. Despite having been charged with attempting use his constitutional appointment powers to sell President-elect Barack more...

Alert!Close


Confirm!Close


FeedbackClose




Email Address:

Comments


Image Verification:
(Case Sensitive)

JoinClose


Username:
Password:
Retype Password:
Email:
Image Verification:
(case sensitive):


Forgot Pass?Close


Username:
Email:
Image Verification:
(case sensitive):


Add FriendClose


To:
Subject:
Image Verification:
(case sensitive)

Compose Message Close


To:
Subject:
Image Verification:
(case sensitive)

Message: