THURSDAY, MAY 17, 2012 - This Day In History
House Republicans Bracing for More Losses in 2010
Posted By jwilkes - Saturday, January 31st, 2009 at 12:18 AM
  |   Report Abuse  |   RSS Feed

 

Despite the fact that House Republicans will be defending 178 seats compared to 255 for Democrats (a 41% to 59% difference), GOP Representatives on the Hill are looking at the very real possibility of falling even further into the minority in 2010.

Going into the 2006 midterm elections, Republicans held a 15-seat majority over Democrats. They lost 30 seats in that contest, flipping the majority to Democrats for the first time since the Republican Revolution of 1994. They didn’t fare any better in the 2008 elections, losing another 21 seats. Further losses in 2010 will push Democrats closer to a 2/3 majority that would make passing legislation incredibly easy for the majority party. And while the first midterm following the election of a new president tends to go against the president’s party in Congress, House Republicans are fearing the worst.

A Diageo/Hotline Poll released this week shows that 49% of American voters approve of the job Democrats are doing in Congress, with only 38% disapproving. That’s an enormous change considering that just a few weeks ago, Congress’ overall approval rating sat at a paltry 17%. The Republican report card might have a lot to do with it. According to that same poll, only 26% of voters approve of the GOP’s performance.

What should be more troubling is the generic ballot question. When asked whether they’d be more likely to support a Democrat or a Republican for Congress in 2010, Democrats garnered 46%, an astonishing 24-point advantage over their Republican counterparts, who inspired only 22% of the support.

Republicans are drawing further fire over the stimulus bill, which has been a divisive issue on the Hill over the past week. House GOP members have promised to unilaterally oppose the legislation, and in fact voted unanimously against it (the bill passed 244-188). But a Gallup poll last week showed that 52% of voters support the stimulus package, compared to just 39% against. Democrats are already planning on running ads in the Republicans’ home districts aimed at their opposition to the legislation.

What hurts Republicans even further is Obama’s popularity, which- though it’s less than two weeks into his fledgling presidency- shows little sign of waning. Democrats on Capitol Hill have gone to great lengths to align themselves with their charismatic party leader, and even some Republicans have expressed interest in working with the new Administration.

Their traditional small government position notwithstanding, Republicans are struggling to define themselves in an era when voters are expecting their elected representatives to do something to halt the precipitous economic slide. But as the GOP goes through a period of transition, with new party Chairman Michael Steele winning election Friday, it’s experiencing difficulty identifying itself as anything other than the opposition party.

That platform never plays well during election cycles. And unless the GOP can mount a quick turnaround, the poll numbers that show yet another year of crippling defeats just might come to fruition.



Support Eyes On Obama!


Discussion:
When faced with defeat in 2008, GOP pundits and politicians decided to double down on their same failed divisive rhetoric, hypocrisy, and partisanship. If they keep toeing the line to Rush Limbaugh, I hope they loose big in 2010 as well.
[ Posted at 4:17 AM on 1/31/09 | Reply ]
[-] The party of Rush? - Guest-The Bard of Wilmette
GOP prospects in the 2010 mid term elections will mainly be influenced by two factors:
First, will President Obama and the Democratic controlled congress be generally perceived as doing a good job?
Second, will the Republicans in Congress be perceived as a responsible opposition, or will they be seen as foot soldiers for professional haters such as Rush Limbaugh?

Assuming that the Democrats do not combine the worst mixture of incompetence and arrogance, it is a reasonable guess that the Democrats are likely to maintain solid control of both the House and Senate after 2010. Their majorities might shrink a little, but probably not too much.

It might be wise strategy for the Republicans to portray themselves as a constructive opposition. In effect, their message might be to concede the continuing Democratic majority in the next Congress, but also argue that a strong GOP presence is needed to restrain the Democrats from their worst spending instincts. Their task would not be to kill all the Democratic initiatives, but to modify and improve them.

Many voters would respect that approach. On the other hand, while Mr. Limbaugh may have a huge radio audience, he is generally detested by nearly everybody else. If he becomes the personification of the Republican Party, that party is likely to be in the wilderness for a long time. It is already disturbing to see how the moderate Republicans have been disappearing. Good people like Lincoln Chaffee and Christopher Shays were recently defeated in their efforts to keep their seats in New England. Most of the remaining Republicans seem to represent districts where there is no incentive to be anything but right wing.
[ Posted at 12:09 PM on 1/31/09 | Reply ]
the GOP will continue to lose seats. In fact, pro-corporate Dems are probably going to lose in 2010 as well.

By the end of Obama's second term, you may see the two parties conceptually merge into a single, populist coalition with pro-choice and anti-abortion wings.
[ Posted at 3:24 PM on 1/31/09 | Reply ]
but not that many. Of course with reelections every two years, the Republicans still in the House will have already survived two rounds of the Anti-Bush vote and with him gone now officially, it may not be as strong as it was then. What really interests me is the Senate. Most of those guys last saw election in 2004, the last year of strong pro-Bush, pro-Republican sentiment in the country. I'm guessing for the Democrats Blanche Lincoln of Arkansas would be the only vulnerable seat, and that's only if Mike Huckabee decides to run. But so far, four Republicans and one Demorcrat have announced their retirement. Picking up seats in Florida, Ohio, and Missouri may actually be possible. Some Republicans are requesting Jim Bunning of Kentucky not run for fears he could loose a reelection bid.
When the Republicans aren't sure if they can win Kentucky, it's a sign they'll be having problems elsewhere too.
[ Posted at 3:45 PM on 1/31/09 | Reply ]
the quicker a strong democratic majority can lead America towards a bright and shining future.
[ Posted at 3:52 PM on 1/31/09 | Reply ]
As long as folks like Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid and Steny Hoyer hold power, that bright and shining future will remain exactly that: the future.
[ Posted at 3:58 PM on 1/31/09 | Reply ]
As long as the Dems continue to call this current bill created by Pres. B.Obama, Pelosi, and Reid a stimulus bill instead of what it really is, a huge speeding bill loaded with special interest funding like $5 million to ACORN, millions of $ to the Arts, other funding in this area with less than 21% going to actual job creation items like infrastructure and tax breaks for those creating jobs according to our own GAO; their popularity will tank just like the last Congress lead by those same leaders. The American public has cleaned out most of the Republican Party problems and next will be the Democratic Party. Those Dems will be replaced probably by moderate Republicans. Good-bye to those radical liberals and conservatives and our country will be in better hands. Good-bye to socialism which is not working in Europe (US unemployment rate 5.1% in 2008 compared to 6.7% for the EU).
[ Posted at 10:53 PM on 1/31/09 | Reply ]
political parties should SERIOUSLY consider WHO they nominate for Presidential Elections!
[ Posted at 3:55 PM on 1/31/09 | Reply ]
the GOP will continue to lose seats. In fact, pro-corporate Dems are probably going to lose in 2010 as well.

By the end of Obama's second term, you may see the two parties conceptually merge into a single, populist coalition with pro-choice and anti-abortion wings.
[ Posted at 3:56 PM on 1/31/09 | Reply ]
Just the opposite may happen if and when the Obama plan falls flat. We as a country are getting closer and closer to a communist state with the government taking over banks, Wall Street, labor what is next!
[ Posted at 9:37 PM on 1/31/09 | Reply ]
[-] overdue - Guest-Eric Schwartz
Good riddance!
[ Posted at 9:40 PM on 1/31/09 | Reply ]
I can't stand Rush Limbaugh. He's a blow-hard with a huge undeserved ego.
Looks like he'll become the face of the Republican party...
[ Posted at 9:41 PM on 1/31/09 | Reply ]
[-] Not surprised - Guest-JOhn Might
LOL, should be quite interesting!

RT
www.internet-privacy.us.tc
[ Posted at 10:31 PM on 1/31/09 | Reply ]

Back to Blogs

Copyright © 2012 EyesOnObama.com. All Rights Reserved.
Home | About | Advertise | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Links | Feedback | Contact | RSS

  
FeedbackClose




Email Address:

Comments


Image Verification:
(Case Sensitive)

JoinClose


Username:
Password:
Retype Password:
Email:
Image Verification:
(case sensitive):


Forgot Pass?Close


Username:
Email:
Image Verification:
(case sensitive):


Add FriendClose


To:
Subject:
Image Verification:
(case sensitive)

Compose Message Close


To:
Subject:
Image Verification:
(case sensitive)

Message: