THURSDAY, MAY 17, 2012 - This Day In History
GOP Stumbles Over Itself On Race Issues
Posted By jwilkes - Monday, March 2nd, 2009 at 4:00 AM
  |   Report Abuse  |   RSS Feed

Back to the Drawing Board: Steele, GOP left scratching their heads on race issue.

Have you ever been at a party with mostly Caucasian people, and an African American walks in, and the white partygoers forget how to behave themselves? One person starts making inappropriate pop culture references. Another assumes that since the person is African American, he or she must be well-versed on rap or jazz music, or basketball, or something else that’s stereotypically dominated by members of the black community. Someone else starts throwing slang words around, trying to endear themselves to their new minority “friend.” Even worse, someone starts talking about how much time they’ve spent in the South, or “inner-city.” The whole thing turns into a giant race to see who can clumsily convince the room that he or she isn’t a complete bigot.

That’s kind of like the Republican Party right now.

You have to applaud them a little: never in the history of the GOP has there been so much diversity (and I say that with a grain of salt. It’s kind of like having one dollar and finding another dollar on the ground and saying “I have more money than I’ve ever had before!”). But let’s give credit where credit is due. The Republican Party now has an African American chairman, an Indian Governor, two Asian Congressman (Joseph Cao of Louisiana, who is Vietnamese, and Steve Austria of Ohio, who is Filipino), Alan Keyes, and…well, that’s about it.

If you take every Republican Representative, Senator, and Governor from across the country, here are the stats you come out with: 4 Hispanic-Americans, 2 Asian Americans, 1 Indian American, 0 African Americans, 0 Americans of Middle Eastern decent. The other 233- or in proportional terms, 98.1%- are white.

But with just this tiny dose of multiculturalism, Republicans have lost it.

On Curtis Silwa’s conservative radio talk show last week, GOP Chairman Michael Steele sent out some “slum love” to the “slumdog millionaire governor,” Bobby Jindal of Louisiana. The American-born Jindal, of course, is the son of Indian immigrants. The racial insensitivity there is mind-boggling. Have you ever heard anyone call Ted Kennedy “The Boondock Saint Senator” because he’s Irish, or dub Bill Richardson the “Desperado Governor” because he’s Mexican?

Then there was Congresswoman Michelle Bachman (R-MN). Last year, she read an article on the House floor blaming the economic crisis on “minority lending.” But she managed to top that last week by resorting to Ebonics to cheer on her new party chairman, shouting “Michael Steele, you be da man! You be da man!” after his speech before the CPAC convention. That’s kind of like someone asking President Obama, “What’s up, dawg?” Was she talking like that because that’s how she thinks black people speak? Would she have said that after a Bush speech?

How about Mitt Romney? During his campaign, he came across a little African American girl on the trail, pointed to her jewelry, and told her that he liked her “bling-bling.” That might seem pretty innocuous. But you have to ask yourself, would he have called it “bling-bling” or “necklace” if he was talking to a white girl?

Senator John McCain, the party’s presidential candidate, just promised- and I mean within the last few years- to stop using the word “gook” to describe people of Vietnamese decent. In fact, what he said in context before the pledge was, “I hated the gooks. I will hate them as long as I live.” I wonder how his interactions with Congressman Cao have been? (By the way, during the Vietnam War, that word wasn’t used to describe just the Viet-Cong, but Vietnamese people in general).

Hoping to prevent these kinds of things, Nevada Senator John Ensign- who was elected Chairman of the National Republican Senatorial Campaign Committee after the bruising the GOP took in 2006- sent out a pamphlet advising GOP candidates to avoid “Macaca moments.” This, of course, was a reference to former Virginia Senator George Allen, who saw his hopes of reelection go up in smoke when he pointed to an Indian-American videographer who worked for Allen’s opponent and uttered the words that tanked his career: “Let’s give a welcome to Macaca, here. Welcome to America and the real world of Virginia!” Few people were familiar with the word, which was used by white colonists in North Africa to refer to people with dark skin. As it turns out, Allen’s mother grew up as- you guessed it- a white colonist in North Africa.

Apparently, Republicans like Bachman, Steele, Romney, and McCain neglected to take Ensign’s advice.

It’s not that insensitive comments are a strictly Republican issue. But Republicans seem genuinely stupefied when it comes to dealing with their new iota of diversity.

I’ve said it before, but Steele seems to be on somewhat of a quixotic quest. He began his tenure by saying that he wants to widen the GOP base, which is to be expected. He said he wants to focus on recruiting “hip-hop” Republicans, and by that, of course, he means minorities, urban residents, and young people. He’d presumably have to move the party considerably to the left to accomplish that. But at the same time, Steele is trying to shove the party hard to the right to appease the old Conservative Coalition, forcing the GOP to reemerge behind Reaganesque principles of hard-line fiscal conservatism (especially in the wake of the stimulus controversy). But let’s face it: convincing inner-city residents that the local community centers and programs that keep their neighborhoods alive should be cut in favor of “responsible spending” (i.e. tax breaks for the wealthiest 1% of Americans) is a tough sell. In fact, it’s a downright incongruous message.

If he manages to do it at all, it’s not going to be by pulling the wool over the eyes of American minorities. Steele has this annoying little habit of peppering his conversations with “baby,” to make him sound young and hip (maybe he’s doing this for the hip-hop voters). But it’s phony, completely disingenuous. Plus, it makes for some awkward exchanges. Last week, Neil Cavuto asked Steele whether he would withhold campaign cash from Republicans who backed the stimulus, to which Steele replied, “I’m open to everything, baby.” Somehow, Cavuto screwed that up with this majestic response: “So, by being open to that baby, does that mean you would consider punishing them?”

Minorities aren’t going to flock to the Republican Party because their Chairman looks and talks like they do. Give them more credit! They want to know which party is going to benefit their communities directly, which one is going to address the massive economic disparities they face.

What leads to all these embarrassing occurrences is the simple fact that the GOP views race as a tool of political opportunism. They use stereotypic terminology to show minorities they’re “on their level.” And that will never work. It’s a substantively empty approach, and what’s most likely to happen is that this plan will backfire. At best, the GOP will show American minorities that they’re completely out of touch. At worst, they’ll outright offend them. But whatever the case may be, the aggregate effect is that they’ll end up galvanizing those voters among the Democratic rank and file.

Talk about a party foul.



Support Eyes On Obama!


Discussion:
the republican party is with issues of ethnicity in America today.
[ Posted at 7:14 AM on 3/2/09 | Reply ]
I 'd bet that the ethnic make up of their party's voters would be pretty much the same as what you just quoted FTA.

Damn, all one needs to ever do is watch the Republican National Convention, CPAC or even look back at clips of McCain and Palin rallies from a few months ago. White Bread.

Let them continue that trend, as the nation continues to diversify, they will fall further and further into the abyss.
[ Posted at 7:44 AM on 3/2/09 | Reply ]
they're just getting more outrageous. I mean, their solution to losing the Latino vote because of their immigration stance is to go even further to the right. Next thing you know, they'll be wanting Mexicans to wear a big yellow Mexican eagle on their backs.
[ Posted at 8:12 AM on 3/2/09 | Reply ]
the jews had to wear to identify themselves? This I can honestly say, there are MANY of the wingnuts that WOULD do that if they could. Just look at their "constitution party"... they're not really that far off from being a white supremacist group...actually that's what they indeed ARE.
[ Posted at 8:22 AM on 3/2/09 | Reply ]
[-] Great Post! - Guest-Muzikal203
But I honestly don't know ANY African Americans who talk the way Michael Steele was. In fact, as an African American I was rather insulted by it.

The problem with the GOP is they don't think people vote against them because of their policy, they are still convinced Americans "really do" hate government. They think the problem is MESSAGING which is how they ended up with Michael Steele. I think the fact that the chairmanship position came down to the black guy or the racist, and in a way I think they still ended up with a racist.

So sure, Steele is making the rounds now trying to convince people that the GOP is all of the sudden a "big tent" party, but you have to watch what he says to the CONSERVATIVES, not to everyone else. And when he talks to the right, he sounds just like them.

Sadly, the GOP didn't, doesn't and probably never will understand the true appeal of President Obama. He said the same thing in front of a Black Church that he'd say in front of a White Church. His message didn't automatically change when he was in a particular venue speaking to a particular crowd.

On the issues Republicans are wrong, and it's about more than giving lip service. I mean seriously, the GOP is the same party embracing Rush Limbaugh who is one of the biggest haters that ever lived.
[ Posted at 8:17 AM on 3/2/09 | Reply ]
[-] Here - thereinigo

at 1:35 in.  I thought it was really insulting.

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YSuawzkKpuM&eurl=

 

[ Posted at 8:21 AM on 3/2/09 | Reply ]
[-] women, too! - Guest-LeftyMama
Just like they thought Sarah Palin's gender would guarantee her all those Hilary Clinton votes.
[ Posted at 8:33 AM on 3/2/09 | Reply ]
[-] Interesting - Guest-Lava20
read. Don't agree with everything. But please post a tip jar!
[ Posted at 8:43 AM on 3/2/09 | Reply ]
is make a clean break from its racist past, as the Democratic Party did more than a generation ago. The fact that Katon Dawson was second-in-line to be RNC chair shows that they haven't figured this out. By no means do I think all Republicans are racist, but many of the party leaders still cling to the Southern strategy, not realizing it is no longer to their advantage.
[ Posted at 8:47 AM on 3/2/09 | Reply ]
[-] (R's) are showing the most - Guest-ATFIllinois
pathetic display of professionalism and statesmanship ever in the U.S. It is sad, really.
[ Posted at 8:59 AM on 3/2/09 | Reply ]
[-] thanks - Lava20
for the link. added to favorites. interesting article. came from DK.
[ Posted at 9:02 AM on 3/2/09 | Reply ]
[-] Remedial ebonics by Bachman - Guest-Dirk McQuigley
She said you be da man Michael Steele. The correct usage should be: you da man Michael Steele. The entire GOP reminds me of the audition scene in Hollywood Shuffle. If you have never seen this brillant 1985 tour-de-force satire from Robert Townsend, rent it ASAP.
[ Posted at 9:05 AM on 3/2/09 | Reply ]
I only have a high school education, and I only know a handful. They are all under age 23.

As described in the blog above, you can understand on some level, white people who insert slang and "black" references in an effort to make a black person more comfortable or as an (unfortunately, awkward) way of trying to express their acceptance of you, but coming from a black man? It's like he has no contact with his own people. It stands out like a sore thumb because you can tell from the emphasis that it's not part of his daily vernacular. It makes you wonder whose expectations he is trying to meet. I don't know of any black person who expects any black professional or elected offical to sound like they are from "the hood". We are taught that to get ahead you have to shed that type of stuff.

Slang has its time and place, and use of it doesn't indicate intelligence. I think that it's almost classic that some blacks are underestimated in this regard. Lack of proper speech doesn't automatically equate with lack of proper brain function, and the ability to reason and comprehend. However, I don't want to see it spewing from an elected official on a regular basis. It's insulting for Steele or anyone else to think their target audience can't see through their phoniness.
[ Posted at 2:59 PM on 3/2/09 | Reply ]
You be da man SCB!
[ Posted at 6:15 PM on 3/2/09 | Reply ]
[-] Coolness - Guest-James Dean
Wow dude, that is pretty amazing. Good stuff.

RT
www.privacy-center.pro.tc
[ Posted at 5:56 PM on 3/2/09 | Reply ]
[-] Jindal - Guest-Sly
Is there an actual birth certificate existing that proves Jindal's American citizenship,you know like the repblicaans scream for Obama's?
[ Posted at 6:29 PM on 3/2/09 | Reply ]
[-] inaccurate. - Guest-PuterPnsn
I know for a fact that it's wrong - here in Texas, over 1/2 of our Republican officeholders are Hispanic.
[ Posted at 6:42 PM on 3/2/09 | Reply ]
[-] @ PuterPnsn - Guest-ssn697
Texas, New Mexico, and Arizona never instituted laws that made it illegal for latino's to vote, unlike the laws they had making it illegal for blacks to vote. That gave Hispanics an early "in", and you see the results.

But hey, we need to just get over it!
[ Posted at 6:54 PM on 3/2/09 | Reply ]
[-] English-only ballots - Guest-VCubed
and education were a real barrier for two centuries, even in the parts of the U.S. that were Spanish before the Euro-Americans took them (Spanish-American War, anyone?). Even today white "progressives" like Thom Hartmann on Air America are calling for English-only ballots again.

Latinos supported Obama at almost the levels of black support, certainly higher levels than white voters.

And educate yourself and don't buy into Euro-education on Latinos any more than Euro-education on blacks, please. The vast majority of Latino Republicans are the elites from Cuba, who are white and also felt blacks should step back. The younger Cubans and the black Cubans sent here from Cuba's prisons (so-called Marielitos, and yes blacks are more imprisoned there than white Cubans) know better. And Cubans are a true minority among Latinos.

There are black Latinos all up and down the coast of Latin America and certainly in the Caribbean - the center of the slave-sugar-rum triangle. We're definitely getting over and beyond the inherent racism of Spanish colonialism, and many, many Latinos are also at least part-Native American. If you can't look at the conditions among the pitiful numbers of American Indians still left and not see genocide, I don't know what to tell you.

Let's not forget any of the people of color and some whites (Irish folks, once but certainly not as long as we people of color here, but as long or longer in their own land, by the British) who have been decimated by racism in this country, and let's quit trying to claim the "most oppressed prize", as if there's any winning that horrific contest.

All dark people colonized by Europeans were enslaved, all had our children taken from us and our families broken, all were raped and abused and Jim Crowed to keep us down.

Blessings and peace from your Spanish-speaking sister, not by choice but a history of European colonialism. I'd much rather be able to speak my [mostly extinguished] truly Native tongue.
[ Posted at 2:27 AM on 3/3/09 | Reply ]
Here is the Republican delegation (all 20 of them) from Texas:

Gohmert, Poe, Johnson, Hall, Hensarling, Barton, Culberson, Brady, McCall, Conoway, Granger, Thornberry, Paul, Neugebauer, Smith, Olson, Marchant, Burgess, Carter, Sessions

I don't see one Hispanic name in there, let alone 10 of them. Maybe you're thinking of Texas DEMOCRATS:
Ruben Hinojosa, Silvestre Reyes, Chuck Gonzalez, Ciro Rodriguez, Solomon Ortiz, Henry Cuellar

Half of the 12 TEXAS DEMOCRATS are Hispanic. Nice try though!
[ Posted at 7:15 PM on 3/2/09 | Reply ]
[-] Wow, PuterPrsn - Guest-kingatrock
You got OWNED hard by JWilkes!
[ Posted at 9:52 PM on 3/2/09 | Reply ]
The Republicans need to stop grovelling to minorities and simply hold out (and stick to) their traditional message: small government, low taxes, and individual responsibility.

Bush failed at this, and he failed his party and his country. However, what Bush did as a matter of expedience (expand the government and limit our freedoms) Obama will do as a matter of principle. He will further wreck the economy and plunge the nation into social chaos. And all you'll have to show for it is a cool poster and photos of some terrific inauguration parties.

After this is over, maybe we'll finally learn that a man's color is a stupid thing to base a vote on.
[ Posted at 12:52 PM on 3/3/09 | Reply ]
[-] Broad party support ain't easy - Guest-The Bard of Wilmette
Both major parties are coalitions of groups that have at least partially conflicting agendas. The Democrats have sometimes lost elections in recent years because of their own internal divisions. Democratic supporters have generally included most racial minorities, union members, and affluent social liberals. These groups often do not have much in common with each other. Barack Obama (and Bill Clinton) was more successful than most in holding the coalition together.

The Republicans have a similar problem. Its coalition includes most rural voters, the business establishment, and the so-called social conservatives. Ronald Reagan is a hero to many Republicans, partly because he was consistently able to appeal to all of those groups, which also do not necessarily have a lot in common.

Mr. Steele tried to broaden his party's base by admitting that Rush Limbaugh's rants are incendiary and at least sometimes excessive, but then he quickly tried to placate the hard right by kissing Mr. Limbaugh's ass. Mr. Steele should show a little bit of backbone, one way or the other. By trying to attract moderates and almost simultaneously parrot the right wing message, he will probably wind up getting no respect from anybody.
[ Posted at 2:52 PM on 3/3/09 | Reply ]
Race has nothing to do with helping the American people get out of this recession.

Eric Website Link
[ Posted at 1:37 PM on 4/10/09 | Reply ]
The GOP is like a 50-year-old man with bad hair and no dancing skills whatsoever trying to fit into a twenty-something nightclub.

Trying to be hip is fine if you are in a nightclub, but in the context of the real world -- youth are looking for competent leaders just like everyone else is.

So here, the GOP is failing on to levels: they are trying to be hip where the youth have no interest in hipness at all, and failing miserably when trying to assimilate themselves into youth culture.

Just stay out of the clubs and back legislation that will make healthcare and college tuition affordable. They want to be able to afford a house and raise children. The GOP is to busy fighting the culture wars to pay attention to bread and butte issues.
[ Posted at 5:01 PM on 4/11/09 | Reply ]

Back to Blogs

Copyright © 2012 EyesOnObama.com. All Rights Reserved.
Home | About | Advertise | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Links | Feedback | Contact | RSS

  
FeedbackClose




Email Address:

Comments


Image Verification:
(Case Sensitive)

JoinClose


Username:
Password:
Retype Password:
Email:
Image Verification:
(case sensitive):


Forgot Pass?Close


Username:
Email:
Image Verification:
(case sensitive):


Add FriendClose


To:
Subject:
Image Verification:
(case sensitive)

Compose Message Close


To:
Subject:
Image Verification:
(case sensitive)

Message: