SATURDAY, FEBRUARY 11, 2012 - This Day In History
If He Can't Win, It's Time For Dodd to Retire
Posted By jwilkes - Wednesday, March 11th, 2009 at 1:34 PM
  |   Report Abuse  |   RSS Feed

Connecticut Democratic Senator Chris DoddIt’s been a great career. Senior Senator from Connecticut Chris Dodd, a five-term Democrat and 2008 Presidential contender, is the longest-serving Senator in the history of his state, and the 10th most senior in the entire 100-member legislative body.

But it might be time for Dodd to retire.

Dodd has hit a rough patch in the past several years. After close to three decades of sky-high approval ratings and wide margins for each of his reelections since first winning his Senate seat in the 1980 elections, Dodd has seen his approval ratings plummet after a number of controversies have called the Senator’s judgment into question. And perhaps it’s just bad timing, but nearly all of them center around a big public sore spot in the meltdown of the financial markets.

In June of 2008, Conde Nast Portfolio reported that a number of Senators, including Dodd and North Dakota Democrat Kent Conrad, had received home mortgages below market value from national giant Countrywide Financial. Dodd, the Chairman of the Senate Banking Committee, spends a significant amount of his time working with the flailing US banking system, and has proposed buyouts that would be favorable to the mortgage giant. Dodd never declared the mortgages in his Senate financial disclosure documents, nor has he complied with public demands that he release information regarding the terms of the his mortgages. Countrywide Financial nearly collapsed in 2008, and was ultimately acquired in a takeover by Bank of America

Then, as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac spiraled out of control in the Fall, Dodd continued to insist that the GSE’s were “fundamentally strong.” Within months, both would fall under the authority of the Federal Housing Finance Agency in some of the largest federal takeovers in US history.

As a result, Dodd’s approval rating has tanked. A Quinnipiac poll in February put just 41% behind the veteran Senator, with 48% disapproving (that number improved a little in March to 49-41% positive, but still remains below the dangerous 50% mark). But the really damning number was the percentage of Connecticut voters who said they plan to vote against him in 2010: a whopping 51%.

Former Republican Congressman Rob Simmons- who lost his seat in the 2006 Democratic wave- is said to be considering a bid against him. In more bad news for Dodd, the same March poll that showed Dodd’s approving rating increasing also had him trailing Simmons. That’s bad news, considering Simmons hasn’t even declared his candidacy.

Connecticut is not a seat Democrats should lose. New England is a party stronghold, and has been since the Kennedy era. Especially considering the gains Democrats have made in New Hampshire (where Democrat Jeanne Shaheen defeated incumbent Republican John Sununu in 2008), and even as far south as Pennsylvania (where Democrats added Bob Casey to their ranks in 2006), Connecticut must stay in their column.

Give Dodd until June. Right now, he’s planning a PR blitz that will include a book on the Mortgage Crisis (he’s calling it “Thirteen Days: How the Financial Crisis Changed the Politics in Washington,” clearly harkening back to Robert F. Kennedy’s book on the Cuban Missile Crisis, simply called “Thirteen Days”). If he can pull his approval rating up by then, and he leads any Republican challenger by 5 points or more, let him run. But if not, he’s got to get out of the way. It’s been a great career of public service, but not good enough to justify giving the seat to Republicans at a time when being in the majority (and not just a majority, but a supermajority) is so important.

If he does retire, there are plenty of Connecticut Democrats who would be ready and willing to step into his place. Rep. John Larson is an established Congressman who’s been elected and reelected six times. Rep. Rosa DeLauro might be a bit too liberal to win a statewide contest, but Rep. Courtney and Chris Murphy would be top contenders as well. There’s also Attorney General Richard Blumenthal- a Harvard/Yale Law grad who is widely popular in the state (Blumenthal has expressed interest in the seat if Dodd should retire, or alternatively in Joe Lieberman’s seat in 2012). Secretary of State Susan Bysiewicz has already declared her candidacy for Governor in 2010, but has gone on the record with her concerns about Dodd creating a drag on her election prospects.

The final possible candidate is Ted Kennedy, Jr., who was said by his brother, Rhode Island Congressman Patrick Kennedy, to be considering an entry in politics. Any time a Kennedy gets involved with New England politics, things get interesting. With his father still serving in Massachusetts and his cousin Caroline’s recent attempt in New York, he may be preparing behind the scenes for a bid of his own.

In any event, Dodd can’t (and probably won’t) put the party in jeopardy if 2010 draws nearer and he’s a liability to the party. Because even if he can win, he also can’t put the party in a position of having to spend a lot of money to defend a seat that should be a sure thing. In 2012, Democrats will have 24 seats on the chopping block. 2010 may be their last chance to be on offense. But if they really want to, they can’t be on defense in a place like Connecticut.



Support Eyes On Obama!


Discussion:
[-] He's a pretty good Senator - Guest-Zaphod Beeblebarack
Chris Dodd is a pretty good Democrat for Connecticut, but doesn't he seem like one of those who would rather die than leave the Senate? Also, I don't buy that he's in trouble in that Democratic of a state.
[ Posted at 4:01 PM on 3/11/09 | Reply ]
[-] I'll rec this diary - Guest-jds1978
Its not pretty, but it needs to be said
[ Posted at 4:02 PM on 3/11/09 | Reply ]
contenders were no where to be seen in 2006 when Lieberman could have been taken out. Lamont did very well, but was just too much of a novice to overcome the weaselly Lieberman in the general.
[ Posted at 4:03 PM on 3/11/09 | Reply ]
[-] Oh My - Guest-fcvaguy
"The final possible candidate is Ted Kennedy, Jr "

This will certainly bring out the dynasty purists.
[ Posted at 4:06 PM on 3/11/09 | Reply ]
crowned.
[ Posted at 4:08 PM on 3/11/09 | Reply ]
[-] Dodd Is Very Vulnerable. - Guest-Cederico
For him to be trailing a former GOP congressman in a solid DEM state like Connecticut proves it. If Simmons runs Dodd will be in for a heck of a race. If Gov. Jodi Rell were to run then Dodd is a goner. Luckily she will likely run for re-election to the governorship.

Any open seat is Blumenthal's is he wants it. He is the most popular politician in Connecticut after nearly two decades as state Attorney General. His approvals are an astounding 81% approve to only 10% disapprove.
[ Posted at 4:07 PM on 3/11/09 | Reply ]
[-] Blumenthal would be horrible - Guest-gchaucer2
His approval ratings are high because he is always in front of the camera and jumps on any issue that has been raised by another AG and is popular. If anyone actually looked closely at how he uses his resources or how many AAGs feel about him, his ratings might not be as high.

I'm not ready to give up on Dodd -- I don't want two freshman Senators within the next 4 years -- Lieberman will be out and that is most likely the seat Blumenthal will savor. Even it that case, I'd rather have Rosa DeLauro make a run for it.
[ Posted at 4:21 PM on 3/11/09 | Reply ]
[-] don't be so sure - Guest-Pozzo
I do think there's some vulnerability here, but not as much as this poll suggests. Dodd's still a legendary figure there, is a pretty good campaigner and has never had trouble raising enough dough. And if Rell doesnt' run, the GOP bench there is pretty weak.
[ Posted at 4:23 PM on 3/11/09 | Reply ]
is support for Countrywide Financial (spelling ?).
[ Posted at 4:21 PM on 3/11/09 | Reply ]

After this AIG mess, we'll see how further his approval rating will decline. Not many ppl are happy with those AIG execs getting a hefty bonus. Dodd is probably friends with some of those AIG folks. Why else would he include such a language in the bailout package? I don't buy the lawsuit excuse either.

/a

[ Posted at 12:40 AM on 3/19/09 | Reply ]

Back to Blogs

Copyright © 2012 EyesOnObama.com. All Rights Reserved.
Home | About | Advertise | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Links | Feedback | Contact | RSS

  
FeedbackClose




Email Address:

Comments


Image Verification:
(Case Sensitive)

JoinClose


Username:
Password:
Retype Password:
Email:
Image Verification:
(case sensitive):


Forgot Pass?Close


Username:
Email:
Image Verification:
(case sensitive):


Add FriendClose


To:
Subject:
Image Verification:
(case sensitive)

Compose Message Close


To:
Subject:
Image Verification:
(case sensitive)

Message: